These two are methods of printing important information on the packaging of the product or even printing receipts. Direct thermal transfer ribbons out the information directly on to the material. The current transmission ribbon, however, involves the information being melted on to the back of the ribbon and being imprinted on to the front.
Current print head life and its cost. In direct current transmission as the name hints, the print material is to be in direct contact with the label material as it is pulled across the printing head. On the other hand, thermal transmissions are designed with a back-coating to reduce the friction. Less friction and static means less wear and tear.
Direct transfer risks a lot of damage. The debris and dust in the printer will be damaged with the constant pulling across the print head. The material may be burned, and you will end up with poor quality work or even incomplete work. If you are to use direct transmissions, you should know how to control it to avoid damage from the dust and other forms that can damage.
You can choose to use current transmission or direct current transmission depending on which you are most comfortable with. There are machines made separately for both processes while there are those that are combined and can carry out both. The purely direct current transmission printer is cheaper as it does not have as many mechanics as the other two.
The media you choose impacts the life of the print head. Before you settle on a media, you should know that it will impact the cost of operations. For example, most people think that a coated direct current label is better than the uncoated one. Basing your argument on this fact alone will cause you a lot of losses because even the inferior brands may have a coated thermal label.
No two products are similar. Even the same brand is bound to have different models. The different models have qualities that make them different from each other. For example, the printers use various amounts of heat and speed. For the best results, go for maximum speed and minimum heat. Too much heat may damage the printing.
The results of the two methods last different periods of time. As you choose, consider for how long your product will last in the market. You do not want to have faint writings on a hazardous product as it may cause a lot of damage to the user. The current transmission printing lasts a lot longer than the direct printing and is, therefore, best for goods that may take long to sell.
There has been a lot of waste in the environment which has led to its depletion. As you settle for a method, make sure you have considered the environment. The thermal ribbon uses chemical bases which may cause harm to the environment. The direct method, however, is safer because it does not use the ribbon.
Current print head life and its cost. In direct current transmission as the name hints, the print material is to be in direct contact with the label material as it is pulled across the printing head. On the other hand, thermal transmissions are designed with a back-coating to reduce the friction. Less friction and static means less wear and tear.
Direct transfer risks a lot of damage. The debris and dust in the printer will be damaged with the constant pulling across the print head. The material may be burned, and you will end up with poor quality work or even incomplete work. If you are to use direct transmissions, you should know how to control it to avoid damage from the dust and other forms that can damage.
You can choose to use current transmission or direct current transmission depending on which you are most comfortable with. There are machines made separately for both processes while there are those that are combined and can carry out both. The purely direct current transmission printer is cheaper as it does not have as many mechanics as the other two.
The media you choose impacts the life of the print head. Before you settle on a media, you should know that it will impact the cost of operations. For example, most people think that a coated direct current label is better than the uncoated one. Basing your argument on this fact alone will cause you a lot of losses because even the inferior brands may have a coated thermal label.
No two products are similar. Even the same brand is bound to have different models. The different models have qualities that make them different from each other. For example, the printers use various amounts of heat and speed. For the best results, go for maximum speed and minimum heat. Too much heat may damage the printing.
The results of the two methods last different periods of time. As you choose, consider for how long your product will last in the market. You do not want to have faint writings on a hazardous product as it may cause a lot of damage to the user. The current transmission printing lasts a lot longer than the direct printing and is, therefore, best for goods that may take long to sell.
There has been a lot of waste in the environment which has led to its depletion. As you settle for a method, make sure you have considered the environment. The thermal ribbon uses chemical bases which may cause harm to the environment. The direct method, however, is safer because it does not use the ribbon.
About the Author:
You can get excellent tips on how to choose a supplier of thermal transfer ribbons and more information about a reputable supplier at http://www.vantageid.com/product-category/label-ribbon-supplies/thermal-transfer-ribbons right now.
No comments:
Post a Comment